Showing posts with label World War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World War. Show all posts

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Mummified by accident in copper masks almost 1,000 years ago: but who were they?

Academics restart work to unlock secrets of mystery medieval civilization with links to Persia on edge of the Siberian Arctic.


A red-haired man was found, protected from chest to foot by copper plating. Picture: Kate Baklitskaya, Go East

The 34 shallow graves excavated by archeologists at Zeleniy Yar throw up many more questions than answers. But one thing seems clear: this remote spot, 29 km shy of the Arctic Circle, was a trading crossroads of some importance around one millennium ago. 

The medieval necropolis include 11 bodies with shattered or missing skulls, and smashed skeletons. Five mummies were found to be shrouded in copper, while also elaborately covered in reindeer, beaver, wolverine or bear fur. Among the graves is just one female, a child, her face masked by copper plates. There are no adult women.  

Nearby were found three copper masked infant mummies - all males. They were bound in four or five copper hoops, several centimeters wide.

Similarly, a red-haired man was found, protected from chest to foot by copper plating. In his resting place, was an iron hatchet, furs, and a head buckle made of bronze depicting a bear.

The feet of the deceased are all pointing towards the Gorny Poluy River, a fact which is seen as having religious significance. The burial rituals are unknown to experts.





Five mummies were found shrouded in copper, while also elaborately covered in reindeer, beaver, wolverine or bear fur. Pictures: The SIberian Times, Natalya Fyodorova

Artifacts included bronze bowls originating in Persia, some 3,700 miles to the south-west, dating from the tenth or eleventh centuries. One of the burials dates to 1282, according to a study of tree rings, while others are believed to be older. 

The researchers found by one of the adult mummies an iron combat knife, silver medallion and a bronze bird figurine. These are understood to date from the seventh to the ninth centuries. 

Unlike other burial sites in Siberia, for example in the permafrost of the Altai Mountains, or those of the Egyptian pharaohs, the purpose did not seem to be to mummify the remains, hence the claim that their preservation until modern times was an accident.

The soil in this spot is sandy and not permanently frozen.A combination of the use of copper, which prevented oxidation, and a sinking of the temperature in the 14th century, is behind the good condition of the remains today. 




Belt buckle, fragments of the belt, bracelet and silver decorations researchers found inside the burials. Pictures: Natalya Fyodorova

Natalia Fyodorova, of the Ural branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said: 'Nowhere in the world are there so many mummified remains found outside the permafrost or the marshes. 

'It is a unique archaeological site. We are pioneers in everything from taking away the object of sandy soil (which has not been done previously) and ending with the possibility of further research.'

In 2002, archeologists were forced to halt work at the site due to objections by locals on the Yamal peninsula, a land of reindeer and energy riches known to locals as 'the end of the earth'.

The experts were disturbing the souls of their ancestors, they feared. However, work is underway again, including a genetic study of the remains headed by Alexander Pilipenko, research fellow of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 



'Nowhere in the world are there so many mummified remains found outside the permafrost or the marshes'. Pictures: Kate Baklitskaya, Go East

Fyodorova suggests that the smashing of the skulls may have been done soon after death 'to render protection from mysterious spells believed to emanate from the deceased'.

With work underway again, archeologists hope for clearer answers. 






Saturday, August 2, 2014

Now two NEW large holes appear in Siberia

Cause of Mysterious Siberian Holes Possibly Found

A trio of mysterious gaping holes in northern Siberia has spawned many theories about the craters' origin, but scientists have suggested some concrete explanations.

In mid-July, reindeer herders stumbled across a crater that was approximately 260 feet (80 meters) wide, on the Yamal Peninsula, whose name means "end of the world," The Siberian Times reported. Since then, two new chasms — a 50-foot (15 m) crater in the Taz district and a 200- to 330-foot (60 to 100 m) crater in the Taymyr Peninsula — have also been reported.

Neither aliens nor meteorites caused the strange cavities, as some had speculated, but the true explanation could be exciting nonetheless. Russian scientists have launched an investigation to find out more. [How Weird! The Top 10 Unexplained Phenomena]

Helicopter video footage of the first hole shows it is surrounded by a mound of loose dirt that appears to have been thrown out of the hole.

"My personal opinion is it's some type of sinkhole," said Vladimir Romanovsky, a geophysicist who studies permafrost at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Sinkholes are pits in the ground formed when water fails to drain away.

The water likely came from melting permafrost or ice, said Romanovsky, who has spoken with the Russian scientists investigating the site. But whereas most sinkholes suck collapsed material inside, "this one actually erupted outside," he told Live Science. "It's not even in the [scientific] literature. It's pretty new what we're dealing with," he added.

Early on, polar scientist Chris Fogwill of the University of New South Wales, in Australia, suggested the first hole was created by the collapse of a pingo, a large, earth-covered mound of ice that usually forms in Arctic and subarctic regions.

Large holes have been showing up in Siberia, and scientists believe weather is the cause:


The funnel is a perfectly formed cone, say locals who are mystified at how it was formed. Its depth is estimated at between 60 and 100 metres and its diameter - more than four metres. Picture: Local residents

Millions of people around the world glimpsed the first giant hole after it was revealed by The Siberian Times here and on The Siberian Times TV here.

Now news has emerged of two new similar formations in the permafrost, prompting more intrigue about their creation.

Theories range from meteorites, stray missiles, a man-made prank, and aliens, to an explosive cocktail of methane or shale gas suddenly exploding. The version about melting permafrost due to climate change, causing a release of methane gas, which then forces an eruption is the current favorite, though scientists are reluctant to offer a firm conclusion without more study.



An area around the Yamal peninsula in Siberia is beginning to look like swiss cheese as two more massive holes in the Earth have been discovered. Neither of these new discoveries are as large as the 80-meter (262 foot) hole that was spotted a few weeks ago, but they’re still big as far as mysterious holes in the Earth go. Scientists are already on the scene of the first hole to investigate its origins, but some questions still need to be answered.

Both of the new holes have appeared in the same region of Russia with no obvious explanation. The larger of the two is 15 meters in diameter (50 feet) and has actually been there for nearly a year. According to residents of the nearby village of Antipayuta, the hole opened up September 17, 2013. It’s just that no one in the remote region thought it was worth looking into until the massive hole opened up a few hundred kilometers away. Residents give a number of accounts describing its formation, including an impact event. Although, scientists seem to have ruled that one out.

The smallest of the cavernous trio near the village of Nosok is slightly east of the Yamal peninsula, but has a similar geology. This one is only 4 meters across, but how often do holes of even this size open up in the Earth? Yeah, not often. All three craters have thawed permafrost running down the sides and icy lakes at the bottom. A pingo (a melted dome of ice just underground) has been put forth as one possible explanation, but geologists are now thinking something more explosive could be to blame.

This region of Russia is known to have extensive gas deposits locked up in the permafrost. It’s possible that thawing caused by global warming is destabilizing some of these pockets, allowing the gas to escape and blast the ground above it open, like a champagne cork being popped. If this turns out to be the case, it would be another indication of climate change, but it could also make the problem worse. There could be a lot of methane in these gas pockets, which is a potent greenhouse gas. Scientists are continuing to study the formations in hopes they can predict any future occurrences.


First pictures from the big crater near Bovanenkovo gas field. Theories range from meteorites, stray missiles, a man-made prank, and aliens, to an explosive cocktail of methane or shale gas suddenly exploding. Pictures: Andrey Naumenko, 'Yamal-Region'

The second is in the Yamal Peninsula - known to locals as 'the end of the world' - like the first. It is some hundreds kilometres from the first, which is close to a huge gas extraction plant at Bovanenkovo. This new crater in the Taz district, near the village of Antipayuta, has a diameter of about 15 metres. 

A deputy of the regional parliament - or duma - Mikhail Lapsui has examined this latest phenomenon. 

'I flew by helicopter to inspect this funnel on Saturday 19 July,' he said. 'Its diameter is about 15 meters. 'There is also ground outside, as if it was thrown as a result of an underground explosion. 

'According to local residents, the hole formed on 27 September 2013. Observers give several versions. According to the first, initially at the place was smoking, and then there was a bright flash. In the second version, a celestial body fell there.'

The Chief Scientist of the Earth Cryosphere Institute, Marina Leibman, told URA.RU website: 'I have heard about the second funnel on Yamal, in Taz district, and saw the pictures. 

'Undoubtedly, we need to study all such formations. It is necessary to be able to predict their occurrence. Each new funnel provides additional information for scientists.'




This new crater in the Taz district, near the village of Antipayuta, has a diameter of about 15 metres. Pictures: Google maps, press service of the Governor YaNAO

The third crater and hole is in the Taymyr Peninsula, to the east of Yamal, in Kransoyark region. It was accidentally discovered by local herders, inhabitants of the northern village of Nosok. 

The funnel is a perfectly formed cone, say locals who are mystified at how it was formed. Its depth is estimated at between 60 and 100 metres and its diameter - more than four metres. 

The herders almost fell into the hole which lies on a pasturing route. They took pictures of the hole which were sent to scientists at the Norilsk Taimyr Explorers' Club. 

Experts - geologists, ecologists, and historians - have not come to a consensus about the origin of the funnel, say reports in the region. 

'It is not like this is the work of men, but also doesn't look like natural formation,' said one account. 



The herders almost fell into the hole which lies on a pasturing route. They took pictures of the hole which were sent to scientists at the Norilsk Taimyr Explorers' Club. Pictures: Google maps,  Local residents

The photo of the crater rim shows some vegetation that does not appear freshly grown, which suggests the hole may be several years old, Yoshikawa said. Romanovsky said it might be more recent, but investigators will need to look at archived high-resolution satellite images to pin down exactly when the crater appeared.

And many other questions remain: If a sinkhole erupted material, why is the hole's border so round and even? Would there be enough gas to fuel such an eruption, and where did such gas come from?

This part of Siberia contains deep gas fields, and it also contains a lot of small lakes, which formed between 4,000 and 10,000 years ago when the climate was warmer, Romanovsky said. Perhaps these odd holes developed in the same way that sinkholes did, but later expanded.

Domes of natural gas also exist in the United States, located east ofthe Sagavanirktok River in Alaska's North Slope Borough.

The development of permafrost sinkholes could be one indication of global warming, Romanovsky. "If so, we will probably see this happen more often now."






Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Herschel Space Observatory Running On Empty


After three years of scouring the universe for evidence of the most distant galaxies, the Herschel Space Observatory is running out of fuel.

The European Space Agency launched the craft in 2009 with some of the most advanced light-sensing equipment ever developed. Only when it got above Earth’s clouds would Herschel be able to peer into deep space, up to 10 billion light years away.

The module was named after William Heschel, who discovered Uranus back in 1781, in hopes that new technology to see past interference like dust, asteroids and clouds, might yield some clues about the far reaches of the universe.

Over those three years, Herschel has radioed back some astounding data. From millions of miles away, it could spot molecular oxygen in the Orion star cluster . Several months later, it helped crystallize scientists’ long-held views that Earth’s water likely came from comets.

Unlike the Voyager spacecraft, which have spent their lives traveling away from Earth, Herschel sat still, held in place between the Earth and Sun’s gravity about 1.6 million kilometers (990,000 miles) away. It launched with 2,160 liters (570 gallons) of liquid helium to cool its on-board computers, which run mostly on solar power. Now, European scientists expect the helium tank to run dry in March, causing the equipment to overheat and skew infrared data coming in.

At the end of it’s useful life, Herschel’s story isn’t such bad news. Steve Eales, an astronomer at the University of Cardiff in Wales, has spent months following Herschel’s data, once turning up evidence of 7,000 new galaxies in just 16 hours. Even when Heschel’s fuel tank runs dry, Eales and his colleagues likely have enough data to keep making new discoveries about the universe long into the future


Correction: An earlier version of this story said the University of Cardiff was in England. It is, in fact, in Wales. We regret the error.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Last of Her Kind, Whaleship Charles W. Morgan Has Strong Ties to the Vineyard


The Charles W. Morgan came back to life this spring. The last American wooden whaling ship once again had saltwater under her 173-year-old keel. Ocean winds buffeted her new suit of sails. She has another captain and a new crew occupying bunks and climbing the rigging. When the Charles W. Morgan first launched on a summer day in New Bedford in 1841, there was nothing particularly special about her. By all accounts she was a fine wooden ship, but just one of 2,700 ships that made up the American whaling fleet, working ships built to travel the world in search of whales and come back home with gallon upon gallon of precious whale oil. But as the whaling industry declined and her sister ships were wrecked, scrapped, or the victims of Confederate raiders or Arctic ice, the Morgan secured her place in history just by surviving. Because of luck, the skill of her sailors and the efforts of those who cared about her, she alone remains to tell the story of America’s whaling era.

After a massive restoration effort at Mystic Seaport, the Charles W. Morgan is again seaworthy and embarking this summer on her 38th voyage. She once dropped anchor in Peru, South Africa, Hawaii and Japan. This time her ports of call will be local and weighted with history: New Bedford, where she was built; Provincetown and Stellwagen Bank, where whales, once hunted, are now protected and admired; and Martha’s Vineyard, home to many of the Morgan’s captains and crew members. The Morgan’s story is also one of restoration, revival and serendipity. “In so many ways it seems as if she’s the perfect one to have survived,” Morgan historian Matthew Stackpole said. “She reflects so accurately so many parts of the story. “It seems almost as if it was her destiny to be the only one left to tell the story. As I’ve looked at her and gotten to know her better, I keep saying to myself what a perfect portal, a perfect vehicle for the whole story she is.” ...

The story begins with the American whaling industry, which was at its peak when the Charles W. Morgan was commissioned in 1841. Whaling was a lucrative business; whale oil was prized as a lubricant for machinery and as an illuminant for lighthouses and lanterns in the days before electricity. Sperm whale oil, a higher quality and therefore more valuable oil, was especially prized, as it did not change viscosity with changes in temperature. Spermaceti, a waxy substance found in the head cavity of sperm whales, was also valuable for making candles and as fuel for lamps.

Whaling ships also carried home baleen, or whale bone, which was used in the days before plastic for corset stays, buggy whips and other things. American whaling ships sailed on 14,864 voyages as part of an industry that lasted more than 250 years. Money from whaling fueled America’s fledgling economy, leading to the rise of railroads, westward expansion and the Industrial Revolution. In 1853, the industry’s most profitable year, the sale of whale product totalled about $11 million. But to get the oil one needed to kill whales, and to get the whales, one needed a whaling ship. ...

Charles Waln Morgan was a businessman whose small empire showed the broad reach of the whaling industry. Born in Philadelphia and raised as a Quaker, Mr. Morgan became a Unitarian and settled in New Bedford, where he was involved in the abolition movement. He operated a candleworks that made spermaceti candles, and he had a contract to supply sperm oil to lighthouses. His investments included textile mills, railroads, banks and a paper mill. Over the course of his career, he also owned or managed more than a dozen whaling vessels. From the beginning, the ship that would become Mr. Morgan’s namesake had a Vineyard connection. The new ship was built at the New Bedford shipyard of Jethro and Zachariah Hillman, descendents of a prominent Chilmark family.

Workers at the J&Z Hillman Shipyard laid the keel of the new ship in December 1840. Work on the new boat was delayed by about a month because of a strike; some of the 31 men who worked on the Morgan were demanding a 10-hour work day. The strike came to an end with a compromise of 10 and a half hours.

 It cost a little more than $50,000 to build and outfit the Charles W. Morgan, a square-rigged ship with two decks, three masts and a full suit of sails. She had a rounded bow, and at her first launch, she was painted with false gunports to ward off potential pirates. She was built of live oak and yellow oak, and weighed in at 351 tons. She was more than 105 feet long, 27 feet-six inches in breadth, and 17 feet-six inches deep. Her main mast rose 110 feet above the deck.

Mr. Morgan had nothing to do with the decision to bestow the new vessel with his name. His nephew Samuel Griffitts Morgan named the ship in his uncle’s absence. “I don’t altogether like it,” Mr. Morgan wrote in his diary.

On July 21, 1841, the Morgan was launched. “A fine warm day but very dry. This morning at 10 o’clock my elegant new ship was launched beautifully from Messrs. Hillman’s yard — and in the presence of both half the town and a great show of ladies,” Mr. Morgan wrote in his journal. “She looks beautifully on the water. She was copper-bottomed on the stocks. She is to be commanded by Captain Thomas Norton.”

 Captain Norton was from the Vineyard — he hailed from Edgartown and is buried at the Westside Cemetery there. When the Charles W. Morgan departed on Sept. 6, 1841 for her first whaling voyage, the crew was full of fellow Vineyarders. Four members of the crew went on to become whaling captains themselves.

“When the Morgan slipped out into the Atlantic on that September morning the last land to be seen astern was the green hills of Martha’s Vineyard,” Edouard Stackpole wrote in his 1967 book Charles W. Morgan. “A score of the crew stood for some time along the rail, watching the Island’s shore drop out of sight. There was more to their gazes than the look of sailors observing a last landfall. Besides her captain, seventeen of the complement of thirty men were natives of the Vineyard, and one of them, James C. Osborn, was to keep the only known record.”

Mr. Osborn, the second mate, kept a detailed log of the trip, an account that has been preserved. “Journal of a voyage to the Pacific Ocean, in ship Chas. W. Morgan,” the log begins. “May kind Neptune protect us with pleasant gales, and may we be successful in catching sperm whales.”

 While whaling ships did sail to and from the Vineyard, the Island was a quieter whaling port than New Bedford and Nantucket. The Morgan never sailed to or from the Vineyard. The Vineyard connection to the Morgan comes down to people. “The Vineyard provided the captains and crews,” Mr. Stackpole said. Seven of the Morgan’s 21 captains were from the Vineyard.

The Morgan had just passed Cape Horn when she took her first whale on Dec. 13, 1841. The first voyage ended up lasting three years, three months and 27 days; she brought home cargo valued at $53,052.56.

Whaling ships hoped for “greasy luck” to bring them successful trips. The Morgan seemed to have it. ...

Over 80 years, the Morgan would embark on 37 voyages. The crew and ownership changed over time, as did her home port.

Charles W. Morgan himself would only own part of the Morgan for her first two voyages; he sold his namesake ship to Edward Mott Robinson in 1849. A few years later, he regretted his decision and asked to buy the vessel back, saying he wanted to leave it for his family. He apparently could not find a comparable ship to exchange for the Morgan and never owned her again. Mr. Morgan died in 1861; his name clearly lives on.

Beginning in 1863, the Morgan was owned by J. & W. R. Wing, a New Bedford company that grew to control the largest fleet of American whale ships. The Wing company owned the Morgan for 27 of her 37 voyages. In the latter part of the 19th century, whaling was on the decline. With oil discovered in Pennsylvania in 1859, reliance on whale oil subsided. The sperm whale species was also suffering from years of whaling, and focus shifted to bowhead and right whales. Baleen became the prized quarry, and in later years the Morgan also hunted elephant seals for their blubber.

 With the new emphasis on baleen, ships headed to whaling grounds in the Pacific Ocean. Many whaling ships, including the Morgan, changed their home ports to San Francisco. In 1886, the Morgan shipped from New Bedford, not to return for nearly 20 years.

While many ships were wrecked or otherwise destroyed during routine voyages, whaling ships suffered a variety of fates in the late 1800s. In 1871, more than 30 whaling ships were trapped in or crushed by ice off Alaska. Others, including several ships out of Edgartown, were sunk during the Civil War by the Confederate raiders Shenandoah and Alabama.

 After 37 voyages totalling more than 60 years spent at sea, the Morgan left on her last whaling trip in September 1920. She returned to Provincetown on May 28, 1921 with a cargo valued at $25,533.90. All told, she brought in 54,483 barrels of whale oil and 152,934 pounds of whale bone over her career.

 “She starts out at the most profitable two decades of whaling under sail and literally sails to the end of the industry in America,” Mr. Stackpole said.

 Her whaling career continued — on the silver screen when the Morgan had another brief career as a movie star. In 1916, she was in the silent film Miss Petticoats. In 1921 she briefly returned to being a full-rigged ship for a turn in Down to the Sea in Ships, a silent film starring a young Clara Bow. She was sailed to Salem for the movie Java Head.

She later returned to New Bedford, where Harry Neyland, a New Bedford marine artist, began a campaign to save her. He formed the organization Whaling Enshrined Inc. to raise money for her restoration, turning to the city of New Bedford for help with no success.

 The Morgan found a savior in Col. Edward H.R. Green. He was the son of Henrietta (Hetty) Green, nicknamed the Witch of Wall Street for her investment prowess and famous frugality. Colonel Green was also the grandson of Edward (Black Hawk) Robinson, the principal owner of the Morgan from 1849 to 1859.

Mr. Neyland appealed to Mr. Green for help. On Oct. 2, 1924, Mr. Green responded with a letter.

“I have given the matter considerable thought and have concluded that, for sentimental reasons, this particular whaler, the ‘Charles W. Morgan,’ should be preserved, not only for the pleasure that we of the present day would derive from seeing one of the ‘old timers’ still with us but as a historical heirloom for the generations to follow us,” Colonel Green wrote.

Colonel Green said he was willing to donate $500 toward preserving the ship in New Bedford. If that failed to happen by Oct. 15, he said, he was willing to take her over. Time was of the essence to make sure the boat was safely moved.

So the Charles W. Morgan ended up at Colonel Green’s South Dartmouth estate at Round Hill. She was completely refitted and put in a sand berth near a reproduction whaling-era New Bedford wharf. A crew of former whalemen were hired to stand by, and Capt. George Fred Tilton, a Martha’s Vineyard man, was hired as her captain, though she never left her sand berth.

She was visited by more than a million people during her time at Round Hill, but when Colonel Green died in 1936, he left no money for her continued maintenance. It was the Great Depression, and things looked bleak for the Morgan. She began to deteriorate, and sustained damage in the hurricane of 1938.

 Carl Cutler, one of the founders of Mystic Seaport, negotiated for Mystic to take her. On Nov. 8, 1941, she was towed to Mystic by a Coast Guard cutter.

If the trip had been delayed by a month, the whole project would likely have been scrapped because of Pearl Harbor and America’s entry into World War II.

While the Morgan had found a new home, an October 1941 Gazette editorial bemoaned the development.

".. . Nor will mighty ocean waves ever again pound, buffet, and throw her on her beam ends,” the editorial said. “Many old salts, their descendants and lovers of the sea will be saddened by this turn of the wheel of fortune, condemning her to anchor in almost a foreign port.”

But there were more turns ahead in the Morgan’s wheel of fortune, some propelling her back toward those ocean waves.

The Morgan went through several renovations after she arrived at Mystic in 1841, and in fact she was renovated and repaired frequently when she was in service. By 2008, about 30 per cent of the ship was original.

The beauty of wooden ships, Mr. Stackpole said at Mystic in late April, is that they are endlessly renewable.

 Mystic embarked on a major renovation of the ship in 2008. Saltwater is a preservative, and from the waterline down the ship had not been touched, and was comparatively well-preserved.

“When planks were taken off, we were looking at something nobody had seen since the winter of 1841 . . . we were able to look at the original ship, the original construction, we could see the tool marks,” Mr. Stackpole said. The first year or so of work was like an archeological dig, with the design and the placement of the ship’s planks carefully documented. There are no original plans for the Morgan, or a record of how she was first built. “We’ve got the record now,” Mr. Stackpole said.

In 2009 the new president of Mystic Seaport, Stephen White, posed a provocative question. Why couldn’t she sail again? “If not now, when, and if not now, why,” he said, according to Mr. Stackpole.

“It totally floored all of us,” Mr. Stackpole recalled. “We were so committed to restoring the vessel.”

The Morgan was the heart and soul of Mystic, Mr. Stackpole said, and “actually taking her away was beyond any of our imaginations.”

This led to a six-month conversation and a feasibility study. Mystic decided to pursue a 38th voyage.

“It was really outside of the box,” Mr. Stackpole said. “It’s groundbreaking, or maybe waterbreaking, for any museum to take its largest artifact, to . . . really take it out and be what it was in terms of a sailing vessel was really unprecedented.”

The ship restoration cost about $8 million, and with the costs associated with the voyage and exhibits, the grand total is about $12 million, Mr. Stackpole said.

The restoration required large quantities of the right types and sizes of wood. Live oak was salvaged from trees that fell during Hurricanes Katrina and Hugo. Douglas fir from Washington state was used for the spars, white pine came from New York, and yellow pine came from Georgia and Florida.

Iron bar fasteners came from old wrought iron tiger cages at the Memphis Zoo.

In 2011, the restoration was helped along with a providential find at the Charlestown Navy Yard: 17 truck loads of antique live oak and white oak, cut for use during the tall ship era. The wood had been preserved in mud since roughly the 1860s, and some of the wood was 200 years old.

 About 18 per cent of the original ship now remains. She was given about 280 new futtocks (curved timbers that form the ribs of the ship), 70 new ceiling planks and 168 new planks in the hull. In the ship’s hold, the original planks are easy to spot among the newer pieces of wood. She has her original oak keel, the one that was laid at the Hillman shipyard in 1840.

Whaleships were working ships, and the Morgan is the second oldest merchant ship in the country, second only to the U.S.S. Constitution. The Morgan’s role was to gather and store oil. “Like a current day tanker,” Mr. Stackpole said.

“This ship had it all figured out,” Mr. Stackpole said. “She represents really the pinnacle of the whaleship design.”

With the ship’s restoration and the 38th voyage, a new generation of shipwrights are learning to work on an old whaling ship, and a new captain and crew are learning how to sail her.

 About 30 people worked on the ship at the peak of framing, with about 18 to 20 people working on her most of the time. The shipwrights worked under the direction of lead shipwright Rob Whalen, who coordinated the process.

 “It’s sort of like working on any other wooden ship except for the fact that it’s the Morgan,” Mr. Whalen, 56, said last week.

“It puts you a lot closer to the source of everything in terms of things nautical and American,” he said. “It gives you a different perspective of all that that is kind of difficult to get from historical texts, reading or just walking the deck. You get a much more in-depth understanding of it all in doing this.”

The work has paid off: Mr. Whalen was speaking by cell phone from the Morgan as she sailed on one of her sea trials. “She’s going under sail power,” he said. “She’s kinda hobbying along quite nicely. No mechanical noise.”

 For many involved with the restoration and the 38th voyage, the Morgan actually sailing is the culmination of decades of work. Senior shipwright Roger Hambidge has been working on the Morgan since 1973, when he and other shipwrights removed remnants of the ship’s copper sheathing. After leaving Mystic in 2002, he came back a few years ago to help with the restoration, documenting and hand-drawing the construction and providing his knowledge of old shipwright tools.

“Here’s the thing that got me,” Mr. Hambidge, 62, said. “We pulled up all the old ceiling planking. The inside is heavy stuff, three-inch-thick yellow pine, very long and wide. We exposed all those old frames, 1841 timbers, you see some of the tool marks and stuff like that. When we pulled those out, it was the first time anybody had seen that since 1841. The last person to touch this piece is long gone. What got me is what a different world it was, no electricity, no cell phones.”

 Many of the deck beams are still from 1841, and tell a story about the men who built the Morgan. “A lot of the tool marks are very, very crisp and clean, and you can actually determine if the person doing that work was right or left handed by the angle of the chopping. We could also see where patterns changed,” he said, allowing them to determine how many different people worked on each section.

While the Mystic shipwrights did use modern-day technology, an effort was made to have the last work done on each part by hand, Mr. Stackpole said. Shipwrights like Mr. Hambidge used some of the same kinds of tools that were used in 1841.

“The skill and knowledge about how to do this kind of work is being passed on to a whole new generation of shipwrights,” Mr. Stackpole said.

The ship has been restored to how she appeared in the years she was owned by the Wing corporation, mostly because those years are best documented with pictures. In 1867 she was re-rigged as a bark, meaning she had square sails on only two masts; that is how she will sail on her 38th voyage.

Today, she flies the Wing house flag, a white and navy blue flag with a W and a red circle. She also flies a Mystic Seaport flag emblazoned with an M.

In 1841, a gold coin was placed under the foremast for good luck. During renovations, the heel of the foremast still bore the impression of the coin.

For her 38th voyage, there are coins under each of the Morgan’s three masts: an 1841 silver dollar, representing the original launch; a 1941 silver dollar, representing the ship’s arrival at Mystic Seaport, and a 2013 silver dollar, representing the current restoration.

In May, the Morgan left Mystic for New London, where her rigging was completed and her sails were put on. In early June, the Morgan sailed again for the first time, going out on Long Island Sound for the first of several sea trials. This was the first time anyone alive had seen an American whaleship at sail.

The Morgan’s captain for the 38th voyage is Richard (Kip) Files of Rockland, Me.

“The first thing most kids say is, look at the pirate ship,” Captain Files said in May, surrounded by navigation instruments on the Morgan. He said the Morgan is here to correct that misconception. “They have no concept of how the whaling industry created and protected this country. It’s cool to tell that history.” The thing that differentiates the Morgan from other ships is her history.

“The challenge is to make sure you don’t hurt the archive,” he said. But in other ways, “it’s a sailboat. Sails go up and sails go down,” he said.

But then again, “there’s nobody alive that’s sailed a vessel like this.”

While the crew kept meticulous logs, many of which survive, “They didn’t write about all of this,” Captain Files said. “They wrote the number of barrels, the number of miles, but the sailing aspect of it” is more of a mystery, he said. “We just don’t know the character because she’s so different.”

Second mate Sean M. Bercaw, who is also the captain of the Amistad, concurred that the logbooks are cryptic. “Hove to in the usual fashion,” Mr. Bercaw recalled. “Well, what does that mean?”

“It wasn’t like they were being shady,” he added. “They all knew.”

There was a lot of life on the Morgan: more than 1,300 men sailed on her, as well as five captains’ wives and some of their children. As the years went by, the crews became more diverse. After stowing 1,000 pounds of oil, the crew would celebrate by frying donuts in whale oil. One Christmas, Capt. Charles Church gave each man a jar of marmalade.

There were also hard times, and even death. Several men died during voyages, some from sickness, others from drowning. Men were flogged, put in irons and they deserted. Some were certainly homesick during their long voyages.

“Physically it’s not that different from any other boat,” Cassie Sleeper, 30, a senior deckhand, said in May, seated in the blubber room as the ship was docked in New London. “When you think about it, it’s pretty cool. It’s from 1841.”

The crew was busy getting the ship ready — Ms. Sleeper said she had been aloft on the rigging twice that say already. She reflected on the Morgan in days past: “It would have smelled a lot worse, been a lot darker. There were more people around,” she said.

The Morgan is an exceptionally well-documented ship — second only to the Constitution, Mr. Stackpole said — and her story touches on many different aspects of American history.

“Certainly her cargo is indeed history and all we can learn from it,” Mr. Stackpole said. “And in this voyage she is making history. This is indeed history that is happening because of her.”

And now there’s another chapter, a 38th voyage. There will be no whales killed nor whale oil stored; in the hold, where whale oil was stored in barrels for so many journeys, boxes of soda were visible a few weeks ago. The ship has modern conveniences, and those interested can track the Morgan’s journey on the internet. There are several women on the crew.

“When you’re working on an artifact, it’s still just an artifact,” Mr. Whalen, the lead shipwright, said. “The moment when it changed from that was when . . . the crew moved on board with all their bags and belongings and then what was once just an artifact is now, becomes a different thing, it takes on a different life and has vitality and aliveness that was not there before. Now kind of a living thing and not just an artifact.

“You go below now and for the five years of having worked on it, it was a dry, musty artifact. And then you climb aboard now and its got the vitality, its inhabited by human beings. Its got the trappings and the smells and all the things that come with being inhabited by people.”

“It’s a live ship now,” Mr. Hambidge, the senior shipwright, said. “She’s not dead. She’s alive.”

As the ship started to be loaded with food and the crew’s belongings, “all of a sudden something changed, something in the air changed,” Mr. Hambidge said. “What changed was this overwhelming feeling that the ship all of a sudden came alive. It was almost like she was tugging on her lines saying I want to go, I want to do this. She woke up and said hey, let’s go.”

Monday, July 28, 2014

How World War I Helps Explain Today's Middle East Bloodshed

Hitler's ambition sparked the Second World War, but the tinderbox of Eastern Europe was its fuel.



The Great War, as it came to be known, lasted four years, from 1914 to 1918. But its aftereffects haunted Europe and the rest of the world through the 20th century—and are still felt in our own times.

In this groundbreaking book, British historian David Reynolds ranges far and wide across economics, poetry, diplomacy, and politics to tease out the complex consequences of what was hoped to be "the war to end all wars" but instead became the precursor of World War II and numerous other conflicts, including the war in Iraq.

Here Reynolds talks about how women's lives were changed by the conflict, how Woodrow Wilson's policies led to the rise of America as a global power, and why it's crucial to look beyond the myths that have shaped our perception of World War I.

Tomorrow is the hundredth anniversary of the outbreak of the Great War. Why did you call your book The Long Shadow?

Because I think the Great War does cast a long shadow over the 20th century. George Kennan, the American historian and diplomat, called it the seminal conflict of the 20th century. The Germans' historians have called it the Ur-Katastrophe, the original catastrophe. So I think that in a variety of ways I try to explain [that] this is a war that we're still living with in terms of its legacies.

The war resulted in the collapse of two empires. What were the consequences of this? Particularly in the Middle East?

I would say that three big empires collapsed, if you think of the Romanov [Russian] empire, the Habsburg empire, and the Ottoman Empire, which still had control over a large area of the Middle East. It is fighting the Russians in the Caucasus. It is fighting the British around the Mediterranean. The British gradually conquer what became Palestine, and what is called Mesopotamia, at the time but becomes the state of Iraq. Those are areas that are hugely controversial all through the 20th century and remain so now. If you think of the fraught relations between Arabs and Jews. If you think of the patched-up state of Iraq. These are fundamental issues in our newspapers today.

One of your aims in the book is to dispel some of the myths about World War I. What are those myths?

Every country has its own great war, so part of what I am trying to do is to explore different countries' takes on 1914-18. The one I am particularly focused on is the British point of view, and the British view of the war is stuck in the trenches and trapped in Poets' Corner—meaning that the British mostly think of the First World War as a story of mud and blood along the Somme, a war that is static and goes nowhere, a war in which the tragedy of ordinary soldiers is understood through war poets like Wilfred Owen, a poet who is hardly known outside Britain but who is fundamental to the English school curriculum.

Though it was geographically distant from the conflict, the United States was also deeply affected by the Great War.

In 1914 the U.S. is a neutral country. Woodrow Wilson, the president, stands aloof from the conflict, not least because he is very conscious that the increasingly ethnically pluralist population of the U.S. is almost a microcosm of the warring powers in Europe. You've got a lot of people of British ancestry, who are fervently supporting Britain. And you've got a lot of people of German ancestry. Wilson says that the best position for the U.S. is neutrality so that the war will not spread to American soil in the form of civil strife. He also argues that it is an imperialist war, the sort of thing that the Europeans have been doing for centuries and the New World should take a principled stance against.

But the problem for the U.S. is that it is economically so important to the belligerent powers that the position it takes economically, as distinct from politically, becomes a major factor in the war. America's economic ties are overwhelmingly with Britain, and so what develops is an economic bias toward Britain, which is in tension with Wilson's political stance of neutrality.

That's an issue which becomes fundamental to the Germans by the winter of 1916-17, when the war is deadlocked on the land front. The Germans start unrestricted U-boat warfare to cut Britain's lines of communication with the U.S. It's an act of desperation and a breach of international war. And it's what ultimately pushes the U.S. into the conflict in April 1917. Its new position as the arbiter of world affairs is the start of America's rise to global supremacy in the 20th century.

America was also the biggest economic beneficiary of the war. America before the war is a net debtor in international currency flows, to the tune of $3.7 billion. Rather neatly, by the end of the war it is a net creditor of $3.7 billion.

Perhaps partly because you are a British historian, it's the British experience that is at the heart of the book. Britain came out of the conflict with its empire enhanced. The war also forged a new sense of British identity. Can you unpack those two things?

The British Empire grows to its largest extent as a result of the war of 1914-18. Particularly in terms of its new possessions in the Middle East, like Iraq and Palestine, which prove to be something of a poisoned chalice but are big assets for the British at the time. In the case of Iraq, the British get access to crucial new resources, like oil.

The empire grows in another way. One of the distinctive things about it was the so-called settler colonies—where people of British stock have gone abroad and established their own colonies, usually at the expense of native populations—like Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa. These "dominions" were extremely important to the war effort and again in the Second World War. And that sense of a British world, or Commonwealth, was a very powerful addition to Britain's capabilities. The Indian Army contributes something like one million men to the British Army in World War I, and they become part of the story.

The way the war dead were commemorated varied greatly from nation to nation and says a lot about the cultural values of the combatants, doesn't it?

In previous wars, certainly 19th-century wars, dead soldiers had been basically thrown into anonymous mass graves. But we are now in a democratic era in which, at least officially, each person is counted equally in politics and in society. The powerful feeling among the older men, who have in a sense sent the younger men to war, is that these young men should be recognized and honored. It would be far too expensive to bring the soldiers back: We're talking about 720,000 dead. Instead, you bury them with honor where they fell, and you also ensure that each grave has the man's name attached to it. So all along the western front, for almost a hundred miles, you have this necklace of war cemeteries, beautifully kept up by the Imperial War Graves Commission. The British are honoring their dead in what Rupert Brooke called "a foreign field that is for ever England," and that's part of the poignancy of the British commemoration.

Rudyard Kipling was very active in promoting the concept of the war graves—and there's a reason for that, isn't there?

Kipling was involved in the planning of the war cemeteries and in particular in some of the language that was used. He's the originator of a very poignant phrase for soldiers whose bodies had been found but were never identified: "Known Unto God." Kipling felt deeply about this because he had sent his only son, Jack, into the war. Jack had very bad eyesight and could easily have gotten a medical exemption. But he wanted to fight, and his father wanted him to fight. Jack was last seen on the battlefield of Loos in 1915 with half his face shot off. His body was never found during Kipling's lifetime. It's possible that he's now been found, but that's disputed. And I think he sublimated his guilt in this process of war commemoration in a way that is very, very sad.

We've talked so far mostly about men, but the Great War also had a decisive effect on women, didn't it?

The war changes the terms of the debate. Because a lot of women take on men's jobs, in the factories or running the trams. Eight hundred thousand women work in munitions factories. They are known as "Tommy's Sister." Tommy is the soldier on the front. Tommy's Sister helps him by producing essential supplies like munitions, guns, food that are necessary for an era of what is called "total war." In other words, a war that involved the home front as much as the battlefield. So a lot of politicians who are violently opposed to suffrage in 1914 have to admit that men who fought, and women who have done war service on the home front, have shown their right to citizenship.

It was called "the war to end all wars," but that didn't happen. In 1939 Europe was at war again. How much did the Second World War grow out of the legacy of 1914-18?

In significant ways the war that began in 1939 grows out of the unresolved issues of 1918. Above all, Germany thinks that it had been put in a subordinate and humiliating position in Europe, which was unacceptable. So the German desire for revenge and for reviving its international position was central. Equally, you have a situation in Eastern Europe where you have these various small and not viable new states with disputed borders and minority problems. It's no accident that the big crisis of 1938 is over Czechoslovakia and the German minority there, plus Poland, which is disputed between Russia and Germany. Hitler's ambition is the fire for the new conflict. But the fuel for the Second World War is this tinderbox in Eastern Europe.

What was the most moving part of your research?

I think the part that I found most moving to write was the chapter called "Civilization," which is where the devastation and loss of life of this appalling conflict is understood through poetry and art. It is an attempt to reflect and add meaning—and in a strange way a sense of beauty—to something that was grotesque and appalling. And that struggle, which is what art is about, seemed to me particularly poignant in the case of this conflict.

The BBC and other British institutions, like the Imperial War Museum, are investing enormous resources in centenary commemorations. What do you hope will be achieved?


My hope is that the centenary is going to be not just an act of remembrance for the dead but also an opportunity to understand the 1914-18 war in terms of its broader impact on the home fronts and on the wider world—to move it from simply remembrance to trying to understand this appalling conflict, which fundamentally shaped the century that followed, and in some ways still shapes the world we live in now.
Copyright © 2014 Archaeology Excavation